I don’t get it! What have Christians lost?


Should Christians who are celebrating marriage equality empathize with those who are grieving over the Supreme Court ruling?  

The call to empathy comes from a colleague in ministry in a recent post. He writes,  

“Whether or not you agree with those who weep, they are still weeping today. They are experiencing loss. The world that they anticipated living into has changed. It’s not going back. It will never be the same. I’m not making any arguments about whether that is good or bad. . . . What I want to say today is that there are those among us who are mourning. What are we going to do about it?”

My colleague quotes Paul who says to the church in Rome, “Rejoice with those who rejoice, weep with those who weep” (Rom. 12:15). He claims that “our first responsibility is to try to empathize with each other’s experience,” but the thrust of his admonition is aimed at those of us who are celebrating, not grieving.  He challenges us to be “wounded healers” (Henri Nouwen’s phrase) to those who have encountered marriage equality as “a train wreck” and have experienced “genuine loss and trauma.” He points out that we are all members of the body of Christ and he encourages us to empathize with those hurting so we might be “avenues of healing and conduits of grace.”

So what is it exactly that our sisters and brothers who are weeping have lost? According to my friend they have had to say good-bye “to something that was supposed to be there for the rest of their lives.” It’s “the loss of a cultural structure that has been around for multiple thousands of years.” They are depressed because “deep is their grief about a world that is changing in ways that violate their world-view.” That’s about as close as he gets to actually naming it.

What sort of “cultural structure” has been lost that is causing such deep grief? The last time I checked heterosexual marriage between one man and one woman with all the protections our legal system affords such a union is still very much in place. What has been lost other than the right to deny same-sex couples the same rights, privileges, and protections under the law that heterosexual couples have long enjoyed?

Is this something Christians should empathize with and grieve over?

Can you imagine after civil rights legislation passed in the Supreme Court, some white Christian leader admonishing African-Americans and their allies to stifle their celebrations and empathize with those grieving over “the loss of a cultural structure” that enabled segregation, discrimination, and oppression?

It’s relatively easy to name what my friend side-steps. What is lost is the right to deny and discriminate against same-sex couples. And thankfully one very conservative Supreme Court Justice who recognized this decided to right the wrong.

What you or I or anyone else believes about marriage is irrelevant here. The issue is equal protection under the law for a minority group that has suffered much for many years. This marginalized group has been finally vindicated (in part that is, there is still much more work to do to get these rights extended into the workplace). That is the cultural shift that anti-gay proponents and sympathizers are lamenting.

Can you imagine one of the classic Hebrew prophets who railed against Israel’s unjust leaders and their followers for enslaving the poor and depriving the most vulnerable of basic needs, calling for empathy toward the oppressors simply because they were all one people in covenant with God?

What does it mean to be a conduit of grace in such a context? For healing to occur the disease has to be confronted. Empathy is not what is needed. Liberation is what is needed. The demon has to be named and exorcised.

Is it even possible to empathize with oppressors who do not see or acknowledge the oppression their actions cause? I can love them, but I can’t empathize with them

So, to all my Christian friends who want us to tone it down and curtail our celebrations over marriage equality – please, have some empathy yourselves!

Let your “No be No” or your “Yes be Yes,” but please, spare us the sanctimonious religious rhetoric that mistakingly equates frustration and anger over the collapse of a cultural structure of injustice with legitimate and genuine loss that deserves real empathy!

 This post was first published at the Unfundamentalist Christians blog.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Getting to the Heart of the Matter (A sermon from Mark 7:1-8, 14-15, 21-23)

It is clear, I think, that this Gospel text is a denouncement by Jesus of the way many Jewish religious leaders in his day used their religious faith in harmful, life-diminishing ways. That much is obvious. However, this is a text, in my judgment, that has been too often misread and misapplied. Some Christians use this text to draw, in my opinion, an inappropriate distinction between scripture and tradition. They generally lock on to verse 8 where Jesus is purported as saying, “You abandon the commandment of God and hold to human tradition.” They argue that human tradition is bad, while the commandment of God, which they tend to identify as scripture as a whole is good.  So they make this rigid distinction between tradition and scripture The problem with that explanation is that the mention of “human tradition” in verse 8 is not a reference to all tradition. It’s a reference to the particular way these Jewish leaders were interpreting and applying that tradition. Scriptur...
Read more

Going Deeper (A sermon from Luke 5:1-11)

The story I read earlier from Luke 5, which is today’s sermon text, is Luke’s account of the call of Peter to be a disciple of Jesus. It’s different than the other two versions in the Gospels. In Mark’s account, which is followed by Matthew, Peter and his brother, Andrew, are by the seaside, apparently attending to their nets, when Jesus calls them to follow him. They immediately leave their nets and follow Jesus. That’s one version of the call of Simon Peter given by Mark and Matthew. In John’s account, Jesus calls Andrew first, who was not at the seaside fishing or attending nets at all, but with John the Baptist at the time. In John’s version Andrew is a follower of John the Baptist. He heeds the call, then goes out and finds his brother, Peter, and brings him to Jesus. Now, the reason I call attention to this is to remind you that we are not reading historical reports. There are echoes of memories in these stories, but these stories function more like parables crafted for the purpo...
Read more

Fruits of Joy (a sermon from Luke 3:7-18)

We are wired in such a way that we find our greatest joy when we become a blessing to others. We are created in God’s image. We are stamped with divine DNA. And because God indwells us, because we share in the divine life and divine nature, we will never find true happiness apart from consciously living out of our oneness with God. We are at our best, and we are most joyous and fulfilled, when we allow God’s Spirit to flow through us – when we allow God’s love to fill our lives and overflow into the lives of others. When we bless others, we bless ourselves, because we are doing what we have been created and called to do. Whatever happiness we may have as a result of self-serving actions is always fleeting and temporary. And once it runs its course it leaves us feeling empty, because it’s not real happiness. It doesn’t reflect who we really are. Repentance then, is a realigning of our actions and attitudes and desires with who we really are as God’s children and that brings joy.  ...
Read more