Getting to the Heart of Things (A sermon from James 1:17-27 and Mark 7:1-23)
This story in Mark 7 is a story of how some religious
leaders in Jesus’s day, and in Mark’s day, and by extension in our own day get
around actually doing the will of God while giving an appearance of holiness and making a
claim to be dedicated to God.
This is a story that is easy to misread.
Some read this story as if the major contrast is between human traditions and
scripture. That is not the contrast at all. I need to say two things about
that:
First, tradition is not bad. One of the
problems is that many misunderstand the biblical meaning of the word tradition.
Tradition in biblical usage simply means “what is handed on.” So scriptures - our
sacred texts – are part of our Christian tradition. Paul tells the Corinthians,
“I commend you because you remember me in everything and maintain the
traditions just as I handed them on to you” (1 Cor. 11:2). In 2 Thessalonians
Paul or someone writing in Paul’s name says, “So then, brothers and sisters,
stand firm and hold fast to the traditions that you were taught by us, either
by word of mouth or by our letter” (2 Thess. 2:15). The traditions here were
the teachings and practices Paul passed on to the churches. And these
traditions were not fixed, they were fluid and evolving.
So tradition is not bad. Tradition is
necessary. There would be no religious community without tradition. What’s
important is how we make use of the traditions, how we make use of our sacred
texts and our spiritual practices. Tradition can be employed in unhealthy,
negative, life-diminishing ways or tradition can be employed in healthy,
positive, life-affirming ways.
Second, the word of God is NOT limited or
confined to sacred texts. The word of God is a dynamic reality, not static. It
transcends scripture. Our sacred texts, as well as our spiritual practices
based on those texts should serve as a medium for the word of God, but the word
of God is not literally those texts or practices. When you think about it: a
scriptural document/a biblical text represents a particular stage in a faith
community’s evolving faith. A biblical text is a developing tradition frozen in
time. You can’t freeze in time the word of God. The word of God is God acting
in time, which for God is the eternal now.
You see, the word of God is God
speaking, revealing, acting, convicting, judging, and engaging our world and
our personal lives right now in non-coercive, non-manipulative, and always in life-affirming
and life-enhancing ways. The word of God is equivalent to the active presence
of God. The word of God is God interacting with the creation.
This is why James says that we are given
birth, we are regenerated, given new life “by the word of truth” (1:18). James
is not talking about scripture. He is talking about the regenerating activity
of the spiritual presence and power of God in our lives. This is what the
author of Hebrews is talking about when he says that “the word of God is living
and active” (it’s not a written text) and “is able to judge the thoughts and
intentions of the heart.” He is not talking about scripture. They had few
written texts in their world. Their culture was an oral culture. Both James and
Hebrews are talking about the transforming power of God in our lives.
Now, is God’s regenerating power
mediated through scripture and our faith traditions? Certainly. Is God’s
regenerating power limited and restricted to our scriptures and our faith
traditions? Certainly not. God transcends our sacred literature and practices,
both of which are part of our tradition.
Unfortunately, the church-at-large has
not done a very good job helping people understand this very important distinction.
In fact, some of our practices have muddied the waters and left false
impressions. For example, a tradition in many churches (especially mainline
churches which is interesting I think) is to say after the scripture is read: “The
Word of the Lord.” Is it the word of the Lord? Not literally, no. It can be a
medium through which the word of the Lord comes to the congregation, but that
remains to be seen doesn’t it? That will depend on how the scripture is
presented to the congregation – how it is interpreted and proclaimed. And it
will depend on the congregation’s readiness and willingness to receive and act
on that word. The scripture is a medium for the word of God, but it is not literally
the word of God. I cannot emphasize enough how important this distinction is. Because
if you don’t make this distinction the likelihood is that you will revere a
written text more than the living God who is so much more and greater than the
text.
When Jesus charges the religious leaders
with making void the word of God, he is not saying that they are nullifying scripture
itself. Rather, he is charging them with making void or nullifying the will and
purpose of God as it is understood and expressed through scripture. They were
interpreting and applying their faith traditions in ways that opposed God’s
good will and purpose, thus revealing their hypocrisy and lack of authenticity.
The critical question is not: What is
tradition and what is scripture? Scripture itself is part of our tradition.
Scripture is part of a faith community’s evolving faith traditions captured in
time.
The critical question is: What is behind
our interpretations and appropriations of both our scriptures (our sacred
texts) and our teachings and practices based on those texts? What motivates,
inspires, guides, and directs our interpretations and appropriations of our sacred
traditions, which include both our scriptures and our sacred practices based on
those scriptures? That’s the heart of it and that’s where real change has to happen
- in the heart – as Jesus points out in Mark 7.
The religious leaders that Jesus
confronts in Mark 7 were using their sacred traditions to actually subvert what
was clearly God’s will. They used their traditions to justify their lack of
compassion and greed. They tried to convince others, having already convinced
themselves, that what they were actually doing demonstrated how holy and
devoted they were. When in reality it showed just the opposite.
Jesus zeros in on where the real problem
lies. It’s in the heart. This is where good and evil originate and what is
allowed to settle in our hearts greatly impacts how we use our sacred
traditions. An unconverted person – I mean someone who has not experienced
significant heart change – will use sacred texts and practices in destructive ways.
Sometimes the way we wear our
Christianity does more harm than good. I love the story that the late Fred
Craddock tells about the time he and his wife attended a victory party after a
University of Georgia football game. They didn’t know anyone there except the
couple with whom they were in attendance. It was held in a beautiful home in a
suburb of Atlanta – restored Victorian, high ceilings, adorned with expensive
furnishings. A lot of people were there, maybe thirty-five or so, mostly in
their thirties, forties, and early fifties. They were all decked out in
clothing that said, “How about them Dawgs.”
There was an attractive woman present –
a little too bejeweled and overdressed according to Fred. And just as Fred and
his wife were getting to know folks and getting into the party, this woman suddenly
rang out with, “I think we should all sing the Doxology.” And before they could
even vote says Fred, she started in. She and a handful of her friends sang with
gusto. Others stood around and counted their shoelaces. Some tried to find a
place to set their drinks down. There were a few who hummed along. Fred said it
was very awkward.
When they finished the woman said, “You
can talk all you want about the running of Herschel Walker, but it was Jesus that
gave us the victory.” Someone spoke up, “You really believe that?” She said,
“Of course I do. Jesus said, ‘Whatever you ask, ask for in my name, and he’ll
give it to you.’ So I said, ‘Jesus, I want to win more than anything in the
world,’ and we won. I’m not ashamed to say that it’s because of Jesus. I’m not
ashamed of the gospel.” And for an exclamation point she added, “I’m not
ashamed to just say it anywhere, because Jesus told us to shout it from the
housetops.” You to have admit though, that’s a creative use of the Jesus
traditions don’t you think?
Fred along with some of the others
retreated to the kitchen and tried to refocus on the game. They started to
relive the game, talk about the game, when the hostess came into the kitchen carrying
a plate of little sandwiches. Things got quiet for few moments. Then one of the
men said to Fred, “Do you think that woman was drunk?” Fred said, “Well, I
don’t know. We just moved to Georgia last year. I was glad Georgia won, but I’m
not feverish about it.” The hostess overheard and broke in to the conversation.
She said, “If she doesn’t shut her blankety mouth, she’s going to ruin my
party.”
Fred said that it wasn’t like him to
speak up, but he did. He asked the hostess, “Are you a Christian?” She said,
“Yes, but I don’t believe in just shouting it everywhere.” I don’t know about
you, but I get that.
I will confess, I wish some of these NFL
quarterbacks would get that too. It kind of gets to me when they shoot at God
after thowing a touchdown pass, which is just a way of saying, “Look at me.” Even
though I was rooting against the Patriots in last year’s Super Bowl, I admit
that when Russel Wilson, who is known for this sort of thing threw that goal
line interception, there was something in me that took some pleasure in that. I
don’t claim to have been led by the Spirit at that moment.
The most authentic Christians I know
never have to talk about their Christianity. They just live it, though they are
not hesitant to talk about it if they need to. They don’t have to shout it from
the housetops, because the word of the Lord lives in their hearts and they live
it out every day. They are doers of the word, like James talks about.
When you think about it, it is doing of
the word that actually changes the heart. The more we act, the more we do, the
more we engage in fulfilling what James calls the perfect law of liberty, which
is the law of love, the more we are changed on the inside as well as the
outside. The more we embody the word, the more our attitudes, perspectives,
emotions, thoughts, and intentions come into line with God’s good will for our
lives and our communities.
James does not leave us in doubt as to
what doing the word looks like. The little book of James does not employ dense
logic or heady reasoning or a lot of murky, imprecise theological words the way
Paul tends to do in his letters, which can leave your head spinning. James is
fairly clear about what it means to appropriate and practice the word of God. James
shows us what authentic religion looks like.
Those who practice the word, according
to James, are “quick to listen” – they are intentional about tuning in to the
feelings and thoughts of others. They are sympathetic and empathetic.
They are “slow to speak,” because they
know that words can cut deep and be hurtful. They also know that words can heal
and empower. They also know that those who profess to be religious but cannot
control their speech – what they say and how they say it – prove that their
religion is worthless.
They are “slow to anger” because they
know that harbored anger does not promote healthy relationships. They know that
when anger is allowed to fester it can be very destructive. So they learn
strategies for diffusing their anger.
They cultivate a humility, honesty, trust,
and openness that makes them ready to receive the implanted word. This enables
the true law of liberty, love for others, to take root in their hearts and flourish.
They engage in acts of mercy and justice
on behalf of the “orphans and widows” in their community. They care about and do
what they can to help the disadvantaged and vulnerable who are often exploited
by those in power. They are ready to defend the powerless and they seek to
empower the poor.
It’s sad to hear some of our
presidential candidates, and one in particular, use such inflammatory language
in talking about undocumented persons and families, most of whom are powerless
and vulnerable like orphans and widows, who want a safe place for their
families, who are simply trying to survive. It really is disheartening to hear the
rhetoric and to witness the complete lack of empathy and compassion. I suppose
we should expect such things in society. But it really is disheartening to see
that there are so many Christians who support this sort of thing.
Persons and communities who do the word,
according to James, keep themselves unstained from the world. They are careful
not to be sucked into the destructive “isms” of this world, like consumerism,
materialism, exceptionalism, nationalism, sexism, racism, and militarism. They
keep themselves “unstained” by such pollution.
Sisters and brothers, if we will take
steps to engage the word – to practice these things, to do and live the word – I
have no doubt that we will experience real heart conversion. And when the heart
is changed we are truly changed.
Our good God, forgive us for those times
when we use our religious faith, our interpretations and traditions to actually
avoid doing what is clearly your will. Give us the will and gumption to be
intentional about the kind of lifestyle changes we need to make, the kind of
practices we need to engage in, in order for our hearts to be infused and
saturated by your love. May your word find a fertile place to grow in our
hearts. Amen.
Comments
Post a Comment