Jesus' Idea of a Church Dinner

Nearly every weekend for six years, church groups have passed out free biscuits and coffee to the homeless at Moore Square in downtown Raleigh, led by an organization called, “Love Wins.”

On Saturday, August 24, when the volunteers showed up to pass out the biscuits and coffee, police officers met them on the side walk and threatened to arrest them if they passed out the food. They cited a city ordinance that banned food distribution in the park. Because of that ordinance, the Love Wins volunteers had always set up on the sidewalk along the edge of the park.

Soup kitchens do not operate in the county or city on the weekends, and so the Love Wins breakfast is one of the only ways the homeless can have a free, warm breakfast on the weekends. More than 70 people had already lined up for the free breakfast when the police issued the threat.

Jerry Jones, executive director of the National Coalition for the Homeless, has noted that some cities are trying to cut off homeless people’s source of food in hopes of forcing them out of downtown areas. Apparently that’s what Raleigh was trying to do.

What a contrast with the mission of Jesus and his followers. According to Luke’s portrait of Jesus, on one occasion when Jesus is dining in the home of a religious leader on the Sabbath, he observes how guests are jockeying for position to occupy places of honor.

Jesus instructs them to take the lowest seats, not the highest, and then he says (cutting against the grain of all conventional wisdom and norms): “When you give a luncheon or a dinner, do not invite your friends or your brothers or your relatives or your rich neighbors . . . invite the poor, the crippled, the lame, and the blind” (Luke 14:12–13). Jesus redefines our understanding of hospitality, to say the least.

Liberation theologians call this Jesus’ preferential option for the poor. The very fact that Jesus is in the home of a Pharisee when he says this shows that Jesus is not exclusive of anyone.  Jesus does not reject or condemn the religious and political elite, though he certainly does not pander to or comply with or ignore and let stand their abuse and misuse of power, position, and possessions.  

However, it is also clear that the focus of his ministry is with regard to the down-and-out and downtrodden, the poor and impoverished, the diseased and demonized (see Luke 4:18–19).

I wonder what would happen if we (I am rebuking myself first of all) actually obeyed this teaching? What if we actually decided to be collaborators with Jesus in this divine conspiracy against normalcy? What havoc would it wreck on our current church budgets? How would it affect our investment of talent and time? And what would it do to our church potluck suppers?  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Getting to the Heart of the Matter (A sermon from Mark 7:1-8, 14-15, 21-23)

It is clear, I think, that this Gospel text is a denouncement by Jesus of the way many Jewish religious leaders in his day used their religious faith in harmful, life-diminishing ways. That much is obvious. However, this is a text, in my judgment, that has been too often misread and misapplied. Some Christians use this text to draw, in my opinion, an inappropriate distinction between scripture and tradition. They generally lock on to verse 8 where Jesus is purported as saying, “You abandon the commandment of God and hold to human tradition.” They argue that human tradition is bad, while the commandment of God, which they tend to identify as scripture as a whole is good.  So they make this rigid distinction between tradition and scripture The problem with that explanation is that the mention of “human tradition” in verse 8 is not a reference to all tradition. It’s a reference to the particular way these Jewish leaders were interpreting and applying that tradition. Scriptur...
Read more

Going Deeper (A sermon from Luke 5:1-11)

The story I read earlier from Luke 5, which is today’s sermon text, is Luke’s account of the call of Peter to be a disciple of Jesus. It’s different than the other two versions in the Gospels. In Mark’s account, which is followed by Matthew, Peter and his brother, Andrew, are by the seaside, apparently attending to their nets, when Jesus calls them to follow him. They immediately leave their nets and follow Jesus. That’s one version of the call of Simon Peter given by Mark and Matthew. In John’s account, Jesus calls Andrew first, who was not at the seaside fishing or attending nets at all, but with John the Baptist at the time. In John’s version Andrew is a follower of John the Baptist. He heeds the call, then goes out and finds his brother, Peter, and brings him to Jesus. Now, the reason I call attention to this is to remind you that we are not reading historical reports. There are echoes of memories in these stories, but these stories function more like parables crafted for the purpo...
Read more

Fruits of Joy (a sermon from Luke 3:7-18)

We are wired in such a way that we find our greatest joy when we become a blessing to others. We are created in God’s image. We are stamped with divine DNA. And because God indwells us, because we share in the divine life and divine nature, we will never find true happiness apart from consciously living out of our oneness with God. We are at our best, and we are most joyous and fulfilled, when we allow God’s Spirit to flow through us – when we allow God’s love to fill our lives and overflow into the lives of others. When we bless others, we bless ourselves, because we are doing what we have been created and called to do. Whatever happiness we may have as a result of self-serving actions is always fleeting and temporary. And once it runs its course it leaves us feeling empty, because it’s not real happiness. It doesn’t reflect who we really are. Repentance then, is a realigning of our actions and attitudes and desires with who we really are as God’s children and that brings joy.  ...
Read more