Embracing the tragic sense of life (A sermon from Job 23:1-9, 16-17, and Hebrews 4:12-16)
Until we face some something that
challenges our beliefs and assumptions, we tend to accept and believe what we
have been taught, what was handed down to us in the process of being socialized
into society by family, friends, peers, teachers, and the people we admire and
are drawn to in our culture. Job believed what most everyone else believed in
his culture, namely, that God was responsible for the good and bad that
happened to people on earth. So after the first series of catastrophes where he
loses family and fortune he says, “Naked
I came from my mother’s womb, and naked shall I return there; the Lord gave,
and the Lord has taken away; blessed be the name of the Lord.” When Job is
afflicted with painful soars all over his body and when his wife questions his
loyalty to a God who would do this to him, he says, “Shall we receive the good at the hand of God, and not receive the
bad?” He is still locked in to this view of God.
When Job’s friends first hear of his
troubles the text says “they met together
to go and console and comfort him. . . They sat with him on the ground seven
days and seven nights, and no one spoke a word to him, for they saw that his
suffering was very great.” If only his friends had continued that course.
If only they would have absorbed some of Job’s frustration and anxiety without
trying to correct him or set him straight. But when Job opens his mouth they
open theirs. It’s not long before Job changes his tune. The narrator says, “After this Job opened his mouth and cursed
the day of his birth. Job said: ‘Let the day perish in which I was born, and
the night that said, ‘A man-child is conceived! Let that day be darkness.”
The day of his birth is not all Job curses. He curses God. He accuses God of
being unjust. He questions God’s integrity. At this point in in the story we
make a shift from the patience of Job to the defiance of Job.
When Job changes his tune, his friends
feel compelled to speak. Each of Job’s friends speak in three rounds and Job
replies to them in turn. But basically their message is the same. They defend
their view of God. They defend a theology of reward and retribution. They are
unable to simply be with Job in his suffering and confusion. They are sure Job
has sinned and that his suffering is God’s just treatment for his wrongdoing.
Their theology usurps their feelings of compassion for their friend. They
cannot idly set back and just absorb Job’s defiance. They feel compelled to
defend their beliefs about God, which trumps any compassion they might have felt
for their friend. They are certain they are right. Sound familiar? One way to
read the book of Job is a protest against all theological certitudes. Job is a
wisdom book that challenges the conventional wisdom of the day.
In a particular experiment a wall-eyed pike
is put into an aquarium. He is fed for a number of days with little minnows.
Then, in the middle of the experiment, a glass partition is placed down the
middle of the aquarium so that the pike is now confined to one side. Then the
researchers drop minnows on the other side. So when the poor fish goes for the
minnows he hits himself against the glass. He circles and hits it again. He
tries a third time, but he is now hitting the glass a little less hard. After a
few more times, he’s just sort of nosing up against the glass. Now he is
conditioned to know that he is not going to get those minnows. Pretty soon, he
just swims around in circles and ignores the minnows on the other side. At this
point, those doing the experiment take out the glass. The minnows swim right up
against the gills of the pike and the pike doesn’t even try to eat them. The
experiment ends with the poor old pike starving himself to death.
That could well be a parable about the
way we persist in clinging to our beliefs and assumptions even when they are
killing us and others. Consider how often we continue to cling to our
assumptions and beliefs even when they diminish our lives, even when they are
hurtful and harmful to ourselves and others.
Why do we do that? Why do we dig in and
defend our views and values when they are unhealthy, when they are life
diminishing? I have no definitive answers to give, but I have some thoughts.
Some of it, I think, has to do with our need to fit in and our fear of
exclusion, our fear of being rejected or ridiculed or marginalized.
Not too long ago our Sunday School class
looked at that wonderful story in John 9 which I have preached about several
times over the course of my ministry, where Jesus heals a man born blind. The
Pharisees are upset because Jesus healed him on the Sabbath. So, the Pharisees first
of all question the man Jesus healed, then they question his neighbor, and next
they question his parents, But his parents refuse to answer their questions.
They say to the Jewish leaders, “Ask him,
he is of age. He can speak for himself.” Then the narrator says, “His parents said this because they were
afraid of the Jews; for the Jews had already agreed that anyone who confessed
Jesus to be the Messiah would be put out of the synagogue.” To be put out
of the synagogue meant marginalization, it meant exclusion or excommunication
from the community. They feared that. And we fear it too, right? We want to be
liked. We want to fit in with our group – whether the group is our family, our
friends, our church, our social network, or whoever. It’s not easy to swim
against the current. That’s one reason we become entrenched in beliefs and
values that are not helpful, and sometimes harmful
I think another reason we tend to dig in
and defend our views and values even when they are not doing us or anyone else
any good is because of our ego. We want to be right. We want to be in control. When
our ego is in charge our faith, our Christianity becomes just another tool we
use to justify the status quo. We use our faith to make us feel good about our
biases and prejudices. Think of all the Christians today who actually use their
religious faith to justify racism, sexism, exceptionalism, and materialism.
They use their faith to justify their prejudices against certain kinds of
people. The Apostle Paul, before his encounter with Christ, is a good example
of someone who did just that. Paul hated Christians, before he became one,
before he had an encounter with the Christ. He inflicted suffering on them, and
used his faith to justify his hate. Many American Christians are doing the very
same thing today toward the undocumented in our country, and our LGBTQ sisters
and brothers.
Now,
the one thing that can break the hold of hate-filled, controlling beliefs and
values, other than a direct encounter with Christ, is personal and communal
suffering. And maybe that’s why
suffering is necessary, because only suffering can loosen the stranglehold of
our ego. Job’s suffering led to his defiance with regard to his previously held
views of God. His defiance is part of his growth. Without the suffering he
would have continued just as he was. Many times it’s the same for us. Unless
there is something that interrupts life as usual we continue just as we are. We
don’t change.
I used to think not so very long ago,
possibly the last time I preached on this subject, that some suffering has no
redemptive value. I was thinking about the horrific suffering inflicted by war,
of the genocides of history, of the terrible evil that human beings can do to
one another. And perhaps it is true in individual cases. We tend to think
individually, and if we think only of individuals and their suffering then it
may well be true that some suffering has no redemptive value. But if we can
back up and take a wide view and a long view beyond our individual lives and
our personal stories we could perhaps see that as a species we are not where we
were a millennium ago. As a nation e might not survive. The great experiment in
American democracy is very tentative and may not last. But if we look beyond
our nation and beyond our personal stories, and take the long and wide view, we
will see that as a species, as human beings, we have made some progress. Suffering is what moves us forward as a
species and teaches us how to replace hate with love. And it is also true
individually, though much suffering is unfair and unjust.
Richard Rohr states it this way:
“Allowing God to be our Lord is not something we can do as easily as believing
this, doing that, attending this, or avoiding that. It is always a process of a
lifetime, a movement toward union that will always fill like a loss of
self-importance and autonomy. The private ego will resist and rationalize in
every way that it can. My experience is that, apart from suffering, failure,
humiliation, and pain, none of us will naturally let go of our
self-sufficiency. We will think that our story is just about us. It isn’t.” He
nails it. Our significance and true meaning comes from who we are in God and
who we are as part of a larger whole – what Jesus called the kingdom of God,
and what Paul called the body of Christ. It does not come from our single,
individual successes or failures, sufferings and joys. Suffering teaches us
that we are part of something much larger than ourselves, and our purpose and
real significance comes in working with and in connection to the whole for the
common good, for the liberty and justice of all, which, today, in our country
our political leaders and a great many Americans have completely lost sight of.
In our text last week from the book of
Hebrews Jesus is presented as our brother who as the pioneer of our salvation
was made whole, made complete through suffering. Suffering is the process
through which we too, like our Lord, are brought to maturity and wholeness.
People in great power who think they are
“something” will suffer and be reduced to ashes like the rest of us, because no
one escapes death. And many of those who were affected by their decisions and
their use or abuse of power will be glad they are gone. Suffering has a way of
shattering our illusions that we are more special than others. It has a way of
bursting our righteous bubbles and presumptions that we are the ones who are
saved or chosen because we have believed the right things, or been splashed
with holy water, or call God by the right name, or accepted Jesus into our
hearts. Suffering puts us in our place,
so that God can work some humility and honesty and compassion in our lives.
When we get to the end of Job, God
doesn’t answer a single question Job asks. God shows up, and that seems to be
enough. We all will suffer in life. But when we look around in our world, when
we lift up our heads long enough and high enough to see beyond our own concerns
and personal interests, it is quite obvious that there are huge differences in
the intensity and degree of human suffering on our planet. Life is unfair. One might blame God for that injustice, but
just maybe it was the only way God could bring about life in the world. So
much of our lives is simply about the luck of the draw. Certainly we bring some
suffering on ourselves, but much in life is beyond our control. This is what
Job struggled with. Life itself is
unpredictable and God cannot do anything about it.
But
here’s the truth of it. God is part of all of it. God is part of all the
suffering and the blessing of human life. This is the fundamental reality and
lesson we learn from Jesus’s sufferings.
Jesus is our symbol of the suffering, crucified God. God shares in the
suffering of the creation. The writer of Hebrews says that Jesus was tested or
tried by suffering as we are, yet without sin. I don’t think that means that
Jesus was faultless or perfect, for if he was, he would not be human. In fact,
the author of Hebrews has already said (if you remember from the passage we
read last week) that Jesus was made perfect, that is, he was made whole or
complete through his sufferings. What the writer means when he says that Jesus
was without sin is that Jesus did nothing to deserve his suffering. He was
unjustly executed as an insurrectionist. Much of our suffering is unjust
suffering. Job didn’t deserve what happened to him. Jesus didn’t either. So
Jesus, who in our Christian symbolism becomes the cosmic Christ, the Divine
Spirit who is for all and in all, shares completely the human condition.
What
all of this means is that God is not watching us from a distance. God is
intimately a part of all our experiences. God is part of the travail of creation. God is the vulnerable God who
walks with the creation along its evolutionary path. When Paul says that
creation groans in labor pains as creation moves closer to the day of
liberation and redemption, it is God who is groaning too. It is the Divine
Spirit, the cosmic Christ incarnated in the world who groans with creation and
with all of us as he bears with us the weakness and sin and suffering of our
humanity and the creation. Even though we may curse our suffering, even though
we pray like Jesus that the cup pass from us, can we, also, like Jesus resolve
to walk through it? So that, like Jesus, we might be made whole and complete
through our suffering.
O God, help us to keep our eyes on
Jesus, the pioneer of our salvation, our high priest who walks with us through the
pain and suffering of life. And now, as we share in this sacred meal, may we
remember how Jesus suffered, and may we know in our hearts that the living
Christ even now shares our suffering and pain.
Comments
Post a Comment