The gospel of salvation according to? (A sermon from Mark 1:29-39)
Whenever I am in a conversation with
another another Christian over some issue, and when the person I am conversing
with claims that his or her position is the biblical view, I like to respond by
asking, “Which one?” The fact is, there are generally several different
biblical views or perspectives on any given theme. One of the things we have
become aware of with the discovery of such documents as the Gospel of Thomas
and the Gospel of Mary and some other ancient Christian writings is that early
Christianity was even more diverse than scholars originally thought. Early
Christianity was quite diverse.
This is particularly true with regard to
the Christian view of salvation. Generally, there is no one biblical view about
anything. There are biblical views and emphases. And yet throughout Christian
history we have seemingly been obsessed with trying to synthesize and
systematize the teachings of scripture. What typically happens is that the one person
or group of persons doing the systematizing favors a particular understanding,
then proceeds to organize the rest of scripture around that particular understanding.
Of course, we all do this to some degree.
We are socialized and indoctrinated into a particular version of Christianity. We
may be born into it. Or we may be converted into it later in life. But whatever
the timing and the process we are taught a particular understanding, and then
of course, our tendency is to read all of scripture in light of that particular
understanding. It was quite an awakening for me to see how narrowly and rigidly
I once interpreted scripture and the way I made everything fit the particular view
I held at that particular time.
In the New Testament there are different
ways of understanding and appropriating the good news of salvation. When it
comes to understanding salvation, the Synoptic Gospels, Matthew, Mark, and Luke
tend to share a common view, though there are clearly individual differences.
In Matthew, Mark, and Luke salvation is about living in the kingdom of God. The
healings and exorcisms of Jesus in these three Gospels are ways the Gospel
writers symbolize and actualize the good news. The individual stories of
healings and exorcisms function almost like parables of salvation. The passage
today is an example of that. Jesus heals the sick and sets free those possessed
by unclean spirits, and he does this as he proclaims the gospel of the kingdom
of God.
The power of the kingdom of God according
to the Gospel of Mark is the power to heal our brokenness and save us from the
anti-human powers that would oppress us and possess us, so that we are free to
love God and love our neighbor as ourselves. If we are pervaded by greed, by
prejudice, by jealousy, by anger, by unforgiveness, if we are deluded and
controlled by sexism, racism, elistism, egotism, materialism, classism, or any
other destructive “ism” we are not free to serve and love others. The power of
God to save in Mark’s Gospel is the power to free from these sins and anything
that would hold us down, from all negative patterns of thinking and behaving,
so we can engage and participate in God’s work to create a good and just world.
The power to save is the power to free us
from our negative self-images and negative judgments of others, so that we can
be healthy and whole, so that we can be loving, kind, compassionate, honest,
humble, caring, empathetic, generous, and gracious, and can participate in
God’s dream for a world of peace and equality. The power to save is not just to
transform us individually, though certainly God cares deeply about our
individual transformation. But ultimately God’s plan is to transform our world
through our families, communities, organizations, and the institutions we are
part of. The power to save is personal, but it is also communal aimed at our
common good and the good of the planet.
In our Gospel text there is a sense of
urgency in spreading the message and participating in the healing and
liberating works of the kingdom of God. When Jesus withdraws in solitude to
pray, his disciples go get him and say, “Everyone is searching for you.” But
Jesus can’t stay in one place too long because he feels compelled to get the
message out. He says, “Let us go on to the neighboring towns, so that I may
proclaim the message there also, for that is what I came out to do.” That’s his
mission according to Mark. So he goes about from one place to the next
preaching, healing, and liberating folks from the life diminishing powers that
possess and oppress people and communities, so that people and communities are
able to truly love and care for one another. That’s what salvation looks like
in Mark’s Gospel.
Now, the next big question is: How does
one experience it. In the Synoptic Gospels it’s by following Jesus. By
following Jesus we learn to let go of and turn from negative and destructive
ways of thinking and living, so we can love God and love neighbor. By following
Jesus we learn to trust in and be faithful to the way of grace and truth, mercy
and justice, compassion and love. The biblical words used for this are repentance
and faith. Turning from all these life-diminishing ways, trusting in and being
faithful to the way of Jesus is what repentance and faith are about. We learn
to do this by following Jesus, by being an apprentice or disciple of Jesus. That's how we experience salvation.
Now, the other big question is this: Is
following Jesus the only way one can experience the healing and liberating love
and grace of God? Another way to ask that question is: How big and inclusive is
your God? If you were taught what I was taught for many years and haven’t
changed then you will most likely say: No, there is no other way. Now, that's not what I believe today, but that is what I was taught and believed during the early part of my ministry.
Back in the summer of 2006, Newsweek
magazine featured a cover story about Billy Graham. Probably no figure in
conservative Christianity has been more loved and revered than Graham. He has
spoken to millions around the world, counseled U.S. presidents, and strongly
represented the evangelical view of Christian faith. As a young Southern
Baptist preacher I took my cue from Graham and with every point of my sermon I
would billow out in typical Graham style, “the Bible says.” In this rather
remarkable interview with Newsweek, the elder Graham was much more humble and
less confident in what the Bible says. He admitted in the interview that he no
longer thinks one needs to take every verse in the Bible literally (that’s a big
admission for a biblical inerrantist). When he was asked whether heaven would
be closed to Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, and other non-Christians he refused to
be decisive. He said, “Those are
decisions only the Lord will make. It would be foolish for me to speculate on
who will be there and who won’t.” Then he said, “I believe the love of God is
absolute.” He told his interviewer that he was spending more time on the
love of God in his final years and that he believed God loves everybody
regardless of what label they have. If I remember, he took some heat from the
evangelical community for saying that. Billy Graham came very close to letting go
of his exclusive view of salvation that he preached all his life.
A few years ago I wrote a piece for the
Unfundamentalist Christian Blog at Patheos. When I submitted the article I
titled it, “Rick Warren’s Conundrum.” The editor changed the title to
“Eliminating Evangelical Double-speak about Salvation.” (That will make sense
to you in a minute.)
Rick Warren is the pastor of a very
large mega-church in California which he founded, and he is the author of The Purpose Driven Life which has sold
in the millions (and is one of the best-selling religious books of all time
outside the Bible). In a book by Rabbi David Wolpe titled, Why Faith Matters, Rev. Warren wrote the foreword. In fact, this
was proudly advertised on the book’s front cover as a selling point: “Foreword
by Rick Warren, author of The
Purpose-Driven Life.” This is what Warren said about the book and Rabbi
Wolpe:
“This
beautiful book is a gift to all of us. So much of what is published today about
faith just rehashes warmed-over clichés and feels out of touch with reality. In
contrast, every page of this special volume has the smell of authenticity on
it. . . . The
closer I get to David Wolpe, the more I am impressed by this man of faith. As an
author, religious teacher, professor, cancer victim, and television
commentator, his unique contribution of experiences has given him a credible
platform from which he presents the case that faith in God truly matters at
this critical time in our world. Regardless of where you are in your own
personal faith journey, I’m certain that his profound insights in this book
will stimulate your thinking and even touch your soul about the reality of God
in fresh and surprising ways.”
So that’s what Christian conservative,
evangelical mega-church pastor Rick Warren said in the Foreword. Keep in mind
that Rick Warren built his huge church on the foundational principle that only
through faith in Jesus can one be saved. He built his church on an exclusive
view of salvation. And it should be obvious to anyone that Rabbi Wolpe’s “faith
in God” is not the same as “faith in Jesus,” which Warren believes is essential
for salvation.
In 2012 Warren was interviewed by ABC’s
Jake Tapper and was asked if he believed that Jesus is the only way to heaven.
Warren responded, “I do believe that. I
believe that because Jesus said it. . . . I’m betting my life that Jesus wasn’t
a liar.” (Warren is referring to John 14:6 where the Jesus of John’s Gospel
says that no one comes to the Father except through him.) Next, Tapper pointed
out that Warren had a number of friends of other religious traditions and that
he was involved in interfaith dialogue with these friends (like Rabbi Wolpe,
who is certainly Warren’s friend). So he asked Warren, “Why would a benevolent God tell those friends of yours who are not
evangelical Christians, I’m sorry you don’t get to go to heaven?” That’s a
great question isn’t it? Warren danced all around the question. He clearly
didn’t want to answer. This is how he finally sidestepped it. He said, “I don't think any of us deserve to go to
heaven. . . I think the only way any of us get into heaven is God's grace. . .
People say, well, I'm better than so-and-so. You probably are. In fact, I have
no doubt many non-believers are better than me in certain moral issues. . . .
I'm not getting to heaven on my goodness. I'm getting to heaven on what I
believe Jesus said is grace. And the fact is it's available to everybody.” Now,
that sounds good, but clearly, Warren didn’t answer the question. He dodged the
question. So everyone gets in by grace, that’s good, but, here’s the question:
Does that mean everyone has to believe in Jesus in order to receive grace (in
which case, grace really wouldn’t be grace if you put that kind of stipulation
on it)? Warren didn’t say.
Tapper was gracious and let it ride. He
didn’t press him. He knew Warren didn’t want to answer the question and he
didn’t make him answer. He let it go. I would love to hear Warren actually
attempt to answer the question about his friends not going to heaven in a
public forum where his non-Christian friends are present. Think about what Rick
Warren said about Rabbi Wolpe’s book in the piece I just read. And yet
according to Warren’s exclusive view of salvation which he founded and grew his
mega-church on, Rabbi Wolpe is going to hell because he doesn’t believe in
Jesus in any Christian sense. That is Rick Warren’s conundrum. My editor called
it double-speak. I still like my title better. How can Warren say what he says
about Rabbi Wolpe and not believe that Rabbi Wolpe is going to heaven? It all
comes back to Warren’s very narrow, exclusive view of salvation.
It’s hard for people like Warren to
admit they have been wrong. It’s hard for them to let go of their exclusive
views even though they themselves have become more generous and gracious than
the God of their exclusive views. I’m sure Rick Warren knows if he were to
admit he had been wrong and if he adopted a more inclusive view of salvation it
would most likely tear his church apart. That’s his dilemma. In my opinion he
has spiritually and morally outgrown his theology but he’s trapped in it. Rob
Bell, who is the author of the best seller, Love Wins, did the same thing. But
Rob Bell refused to be trapped and refused to stop growing. When Rob Bell left
his exclusive view of salvation he also left his church, a mega-church that,
like Warren, he had founded.
I like Rick Warren. I am praying for
Rick Warren. Warren is one of the few evangelical leaders today who at least
doesn’t believe the world is flat and hasn’t fallen off the edge of it. There
is a sincerity and authenticity to him. So I am praying that his eyes will be opened and he will find the courage to embrace an inclusive gospel, so at the very
least the God he preaches is as gracious and loving as he is.
What if more of us believed in and
trusted in a bigger, more inclusive God. What if more of us understood salvation
in terms of healing and wholeness and liberation from the life diminishing
forces that possess us and oppress us, so that we are free to truly love God
and love others? What if more Christians, and not just Christians but religious
adherents of other religious traditions who are exclusivists in their faith (Muslims,
Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, name a religion) – what if more exclusionists the
world over would give up their exclusivism and become more inclusive in their
understanding of God and God’s relationship to human beings? What a difference
it could make toward vastly expanding respect and compassion for all people and
advancing the common good. What a difference it could make in moving us toward
equality and fairness and justice and world peace. Just maybe sisters and
brothers, the salvation of the world depends on it.
Our good God I thank you for the
salvation that we, in this church, have come to experience through our discipleship
to Jesus. I thank you for the salvation that others have experienced in other
ways through other means. I thank you that you are big enough and gracious
enough to meet any of us where ever we are. Give us the passion and will to
grow in your grace and truth. I pray that we as followers of Jesus might know
and live daily the mind and love of Christ, in whose name I pray.
Comments
Post a Comment