Cutting Through the Snow on the LGBT Question
As a result of the Supreme Court’s refusal
to take up cases seeking to overturn decisions that struck down bans on gay
marriage, same-sex marriage is now legal in 24 states. And that number is
likely to expand in the near future. To celebrate this progress I pulled out my
Bob Dylan CD to hear Dylan wail, “The Times They are A Changin.’” The moral arc
of history just bent a little more toward justice. I believe MLK would say, “Amen.”
The church should be setting the pace.
All the wrangling we do over a handful of biblical texts (Lev. 18:22/20:13; 1
Cor. 6:9; Rom. 1:26-27; and 1 Tim. 1:10) that condemn some form of same-sex
relations is such a waste of time. In terms of the Christian’s practical
discipleship to Jesus, all that matters is how well we love one another.
Let’s assume for the sake of argument
that the handful of texts above which condemn some deviant form of same-sex
behavior (like pederasty, master-slave sex, temple prostitution, or sexual
excess) actually condemn ALL same-sex behavior. Would these texts then negate
Jesus’ call to love our neighbor as ourselves? Would they override God’s
mandate to emulate Jesus’ inclusive love and compassion? Would they diminish
Jesus’ inclusive vision of the kingdom of God? Absolutely not.
If I thought the biblical writers were
condemning all forms of same-sex relations, then I would have to argue that the
biblical writers were wrong - just as they were wrong about God sanctioning
violence and ordering the annihilation of entire civilizations. I would argue
that the biblical writers were wrong the same way they were wrong about the
validity of patriarchy, the moral inferiority of women, or their support of
slavery. I would say: Follow Jesus, strive to love as he loved, and forget
about those scriptures.
In reality, it is virtually impossible
to know with any degree of certainty what the biblical authors of these
disputed texts actually had in mind. Trying to recover authorial intention is a
nearly impossible task, and it is very easy to manipulate the evidence and read
into the authors meaning what we want them to say.
What should be clear to everyone is:
Committed, faithful, monogamous, same-sex relations are very, VERY different
than same-sex relations that are rooted in self-indulgence, manipulation, and
exploitation. And, of course, the very same thing can be said of heterosexual
relations as well.
Many times I have heard Christians who
are against same-sex marriage and the full inclusion of LGBT persons in the
church say, “We take this position out of love. We are simply being true to
scripture.” I don’t buy it. We can read the disputed texts in a variety of
different ways, either as a way of excluding LGBT persons or as having no
bearing on the issue at all.
So why do so many Christians read them
in a condemnatory and exclusionary way? I think there is still a lot of
disguised and concealed homophobia in the church. Yale University Professor Dale Martin contended
in his book “Sex and the Single Savior” that a lot of scholarly interpretation
of these disputed texts is homophobic. He wrote,
“I am not claiming that these particular men are themselves homophobic. Rather, I would argue that their writings about homosexuality participate in a cultural homophobia, an irrational fear and loathing of homosexuality . . . that pervades much of Western culture and expresses itself in discourses about sexuality, institutionalized marginalization of gay and lesbian people, and social structures that discriminate against them.”
Clearly since Martin made that statement
in 2006 the tide has shifted. However, this “irrational fear and loathing of
homosexuality” is still quite prevalent in Western culture and in the church in
particular. Some Christian groups seem to be entrenched in homophobia.
Until Christians can come to a place of
acceptance of same-sex marriage and full inclusion (acceptance and affirmation)
of our LGBT sisters and brothers in our churches, then we will continue to fail
miserably at fulfilling Jesus’ mandate to love God and neighbor and at being
the body of Christ in the world. I honestly admit my personal daily failure to love
my neighbor as myself and to incarnate the love of Christ; I would never point
to my own life as an example of what this should look like. However, I also
would not appeal to scripture to justify my failure to love as I believe opponents
of same-sex marriage and full inclusion do.
Paul got it right when he said: “If I
speak in the tongues of mortals and of angels, but do not have love, I am a
noisy gong or a clanging cymbal. And if I have prophetic powers, and understand
all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have all faith, so as to remove
mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing. If I give away all my
possessions, and if I hand over my body so that I may boast, but do not have
love, I gain nothing” (1 Cor. 13:1-3).
If the church cannot change and become
welcoming and affirming of our LGBT sisters and brothers, then I’m afraid the
church will be reduced to a noisy gong and clanging symbol, rather than what I
believe God intends for it to be – an outpost for God’s kingdom of love and
justice in the world.
Very well said.
ReplyDelete